Gates: More troops for Afghanistan by summer
Defense secretary says war is America's 'greatest military challenge'

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28871683/

WASHINGTON - Defense Secretary Robert Gates told a Senate panel on Tuesday that the Pentagon could send two more brigades to Afghanistan by late spring and a third brigade by late summer in an effort to try to salvage a country besieged by corruption and increasing violence.

More troops could be sent once the Defense Department is able to put a larger infrastructure in place to support them, he added in testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Gates' prediction comes as President Barack Obama considers his options for a drawdown of troops in Iraq. The Pentagon is preparing various scenarios for winding down the war, including a plan that would cease U.S. involvement in combat within 16 months. Gates said military planners are looking at later dates as well and are prepared to brief Obama on all his options and the their associated risks.

Obama planned to meet on Wednesday with the service chiefs, who are helping to prepare various scenarios for winding down the war.

"I believe the president will have had every opportunity to hear quite directly from his commanders about what they can accomplish and what the attendant risks are under different options," Gates said.

It is Gates' first hearing since Obama took office and lawmakers were eager to hear details about how the new president planned to turn around the war in Afghanistan.

"This is a long, hard slog we're in in Afghanistan," said Sen. John McCain of Arizona, borrowing the phrase used frequently by former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to describe the war in Iraq.

"It is complex," added McCain, the top Republican on the Armed Services Committee. "It is challenging. And I don't see frankly an Anbar wakening — a game changing event — in Afghanistan, such as we were able to see in Iraq."

Security gains made in Iraq's Anbar province are often seen as a turning point in the Iraq war.

America's 'greatest military challenge'
Afghanistan is America's "greatest military challenge" and coordination of the fight against the insurgency has been "less than stellar," Gates said in his prepared remarks.

He said it will take a long and difficult fight to rout militants and help develop a nation that rejects the Islamic fundamentalist Taliban and backs its own elected government.

"There is little doubt that our greatest military challenge right now is Afghanistan," Gates said.

Having recently undergone an operation to repair a damaged tendon in his left arm, Gates spoke with his arm in a sling, his coat half on.

Obama has vowed to shift military resources away from Iraq and move them toward Afghanistan and Pakistan, which he says is the central front in the struggle against terrorism and extremism. In a plan initiated during the Bush administration and endorsed by Obama, the Pentagon is planning to double the 34,000 contingent of U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

But expectations in the troubled region may have to be tempered as top military advisers focus on showing even small security gains and development progress quickly.

"That's clearly the message I'm getting is, `what are the near-term goals going to be?' " Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said when asked about Obama's agenda for Afghanistan.

While lawmakers mostly support the plan to send more troops, several Democrats have expressed the need for a clearer strategy.

Without an idea of when the commitment would end, "we tend to end up staying in different places and not necessarily resolving problems in a way that fits our national interest," said Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., a Senate Armed Services Committee member.

Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'll be back later to finish my complaints. i have to go to class...spanish I. ew.


LATER
okay, so what i would like to know is WHY are we even there in the first place? it would be much appreciated if someone would explain it to me.

i suppose my real complaint has to do with the fact that i hate war. i hate violence of any kind. in fact, i hate violence so much that if someone is beating me up, i don't fight back--i quietly resist without throwing any punches.
so it shouldn't be much of a surprise that i'm so opposed to war.
but what i don't understand is how politicians (i hate politicians, too) could let their greed kill people, to let their endless, insatiable desire for power, control, and money cause such unrest!!!!! fuck!!!!!

yours truely,
Brii333